Thomas v Attorney General (No.2)
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
...applies in principle to claims for constitutional relief as to other claims Mr Guthrie cited the decision of the Board in Thomas v Attorney General (No 2) (1988) 39 WIR 372 at 387-388: "Their Lordships are satisfied that the existence of a constitutional remedy such as that upon which the ......
-
Garibdass et Al v Sookhan et Al
...[1994] Q.B. 290, CA at p.295D. G-H; n.296 (d) Endell Thomas v Attorney-General Civil Appeal No.37 of 1984 at pp.4,7; see also Thomas v Attorney-General (No.2) (1988) 39 W.I.R. 372 CA & PC; and (e) Greenhalgh v Mallard [1942] 2 All E.R. 255, CA. 43 With respect to the second limb of the appl......
-
Barnes Bay Development Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Starwood Capital Group
...Consequently, she argued, the defendants are entitled to enjoy the finality of the decision of the US Bankruptcy Court. 109 In Thomas v The Attorney General, Sharma JA explained the principles of res judicata, he said: “ Res judicata, whether cause of action estoppel or issue estoppel is ba......
-
Moses v Charles et Al
...the two was explained in the case of Arnold and others v. National Westminister Bank [1991] 2 All ER 41. The local case of Thomas v. Attorney General (No 2) [1988] 39 WIR 372 was also relied upon. In that case Sharma J opined “res judicata whether cause of action estoppel or issue estoppels......
Request a trial to view additional results