The State v Ishmael (Glendon)

JurisdictionTrinidad & Tobago
Date1997
Year1997
CourtHigh Court (Trinidad and Tobago)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • The State v Boney, Samuel Also Called Sammy (No. 2)
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 26 avril 2001
    ...of police officers what should instinctively be a compulsion to follow the judges Rules when carrying out this public duty. 2 In The State v. Ishmael (Glendon) (1997) 52 W.I.R. 444, I was constrained to rule out of evidence a written statement said to have been given by a suspect in an unla......
  • The state v Samuel
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 3 mai 2005
    ...of their discretion to decide whether the statement should be admitted or not. R. v. Ovenal [1968] 1 All E.R. 933.The State v. Ishmael (1997) 52 W.I.R. 444. In exercising that discretion so long as the statement is not inadmissible this Court has applied its mind inter alia to such factors ......
  • The State v Boney, Samuel Also Called Sammy (No. 1)
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 26 avril 2001
    ...against self incrimination by police officers in whose custody he was pursuant to rule 11 of Judge's Rules — State v. Ishmael (1997) 52 W.I.R. 444 and Whiteman v. A.G. of Trinidad and Tobago (unreported) Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1988 considered — Incriminating oral statements not admissible in......