Sinanan v R
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Year | 1963 |
| Date | 1963 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Matus v The Queen
...addressed to us may have been to submit to the jury, once their verdict was given, it became useless to repeat them here. As we said in Sinanan v. R [ (1963) 5 W.I.R. 459] the credibility of witnesses and the acceptability of their testimony are essentially matters for the jury, and this c......
-
Belasco v The State
...evidence which they heard. We should like however to recall the observations of this court an the question of “unreasonable verdict” in Sinanan v. R. (1963) 5 W.I.R. 459; 465. There the evidence of one Morris was crucial to the ease for the prosecution. This is what the court said: “It was......
-
Mohammed or Sheik et Al v R
...in the case before this Court is the same as the Court in Jamaica applied in Cunningham's case and as we applied in R. v. Sinanan (1963) 5 W.I.R. 459. We restate it in the same language we used in that case, at p.465, as follows: “In our judgment, the credibility of the witnesses, whether f......
-
Clarke v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
...first place. As Mr. Brook put it, the fact that one has served one's sentence when on remand is a mere bonus. (See Stanley v. Andrews (1963) 5 W.I.R. 459. See also Bernard v. Kennedy Magisterial Appeal No. 293 of 2001). His rights under §4(b) of the Constitution were breached because State ......
Request a trial to view additional results