Shudeen v Rajack
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1959 |
| Year | 1959 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Nicholas v Nicholas
...set it aside as the petitioner is alleging in his summons. JURISDICTION-MADE AT ANY TIME 111 I have also perused — the learning in Shudeqn v. Rajack (1959) 1 W.I.R. 349 on the question of excess and no jurisdiction. Further I have read the learning in Bullen and Leake 12th edit at P.1153 wh......
-
Yorke v Yorke
...of Blackman J., is not on all fours with the case at hand. EXCESS OF JURISDICTION AND NO JURISDICTION 56 I have perused -the case of Shudeen v. Rajack (1959) 1 W.I.R. 349. At p. 354 Blagden, Ag. C.J., said:– “The distinction between excess of jurisdiction and no jurisdiction is not easy to ......
-
Re Danies (Ricardo)
...can be waived, no assent can cure total want of jurisdiction. The authorities he referred to on this point amply settle the issue: Sudeen v. Rajack [1959] 1 W.I.R. 349 DeSmith at p. 293 Moore etanor v. Gamgee [1890] 25 QBD 245, R v. Gore Justices Exp N an infant [1966] 1 W.L.R. 1522 and R v......
-
Oilfields Workers' Trade Union
...stated at p. 3:– “The difference between no jurisdiction and excess of jurisdiction has been accurately stated by Blagden Ag. C.J. in Shudeed v. Rajack (1959) 1 W.I.R. 349 at p. 354:– ‘The distinction between excess of jurisdiction and no jurisdiction is not easy to make out. When a court e......