Sadaphal v Paul
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1961 |
| Year | 1961 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Khell Services Ltd v Soong et Al
...following cases were cited: (i) Boyce v. Gill (1891) 64 L.T. 824 (ii) R. v. Kensington Income Tax Commissioners [1917] 1 K.B. 154 (iii) Sadophal v. Paul (1961) 3 W.I.R. p. 340 (iv) Parbal v. Jurawan H.C.A. M-353 of 1978 (v) The Scott Land and Investment Co. Ltd. v. Iris Edwards H.C.A. 1165 ......
-
Baldeosingh v Bholai et Al
...likely to procure the injunction, but which was in fact different from the case which really existed. Or, as stated by Gomes C.J, in Sadaphal vs. Paul [1961] 3 W.I.R. 340 at page 344, “If it can be demonstrated that the plaintiff concealed the fact which makes his contention in the issue un......
-
Mungalsingh v Lennox Petroleum Services Ltd et Al
...order go. In my opinion not so; if the interim order was improperly made, it should be discharged.” 22 And later on in the case of Sadaphal v Paul [1961] 3 W.I.R. 340 at 344 Chief Justice Gomes referred to the first instance judgment of Hyatali J. in the said case and adopted what ha stated......
-
Harry v Mitchell
...the relief asked.” 14 The principles that apply are in my view, elucidated by the decision of the local Court of Appeal in the case of Sadaphal v. Paul (1961) 3 W.I.R. 340. There, the Court cited with approval from the judgment of the Court of first instance that: “The principle that requir......
Get Started for Free