Rouse v Mendoza

JurisdictionTrinidad & Tobago
Date1967
Year1967
CourtHigh Court (Trinidad and Tobago)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
  • Deca Penn Claimant v Scotiabank (British Virgin Islands) Ltd Defendant
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 28 February 2013
    ...have limited employment opportunities despite his specialized skill. 52 The Court also considered the following judicial authorities: i. Rouse v Mendoza12: Claimant was a senior clerk with 24 years' experience — 3 months notice held to be reasonable. ii. In Didier v Geest Industries (W.I.) ......
  • Caesar, Godfrey: Application for Orders of Certiorari and Mandamus
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • 15 February 1989
    ...termination was wrongly: Vine v National Dock Labour Board [1956] 3 All E.R. 939; 944- letter C, Ridge v Baldwin [1963] 2 All E.R. 66; Rouge v Mendoza (1967) 12 W.I.R. 1Continental Biscuit Co. Ltd v Shanks (1977) 24 W.I.R. 267. En passant, I repeat the relevant segment of section 82(4) whic......
  • Ramsay v St. James Beach Hotels Services Ltd
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • 26 June 2002
    ...was not a case where it could justly be said that the plaintiff was deliberately “flouting the essential contractual conditions.” ROUSE v. MENDOZA 30 In this region, the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago held in Rouse v. Mendoza (1967) 12 W.I.R. 1 that a clerk who had given 24 years' serv......
  • Clarke v American Life Insurance Company
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • 2 July 2002
    ...(as he then was) in Fuller v. Revere Jamaica Alumina Ltd (1980) 31 W.I.R. 304 at p.309; Bardal v. Globe and Mail 24 D.L.R. (2d) 140, Rouse v. Mendoza (1967) 12 W.I.R.1, Richardson v. Koefod [1969] 1 W.L.R. 1812, De Stempel v. Dunkels [1938] 1 All E.R. 238, McClelland v. Northern Ireland......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Towards an administrative tribunal: a draft statute for the caribbean community (CARICOM)
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 18-1/2, June 2008
    • 1 June 2008
    ...ER 1264 (CA) ($(#son#3'( not!c( 1ust 3( =!v(n to (1p'oy((s, #s d(t($1!n(d 3y th( c!$cu1st#nc(s of th( p#$t!cu'#$ c#s(); Rouse v Mendoza (1967) 12 WIR 1 (t($1 !1p'!(d th#t cont$#ct t($1!n#3'( upon $(#son#3'( not!c(); Bardal v Globe & Mail [1960] CCS No 755 (Ont H!=h Ct Just) (24 DLR 2d 140) ......