Ramroop v R
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1963 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 1978
...standard of proof that may well imply a balance of probability test. Reliance for this submission was placed on the Trinidad case, of, Ramroop v. The Queen, (1963) 6 W.I.R. 425 which was followed by the Court of Jamaica in R. v. Bromfield, (1965) 8 W.I.R. 273, R. v. Powe, ibid, at p. 395,......
-
Gray et Al v R
...[1955] 2 All E.R.918. Others tried to explain what was meant by “satisfied” in this context, often with disastrous results. (See Ramroop v. The Queen (1963) 6 W.I.R. 425.] 29 But in several other cases, although the use of the word “satisfied” by itself was depreciated:, the appeals were di......
-
Singh et Al v R
...v D. P. P. (supra) did not apply to him. It was contended however, that both the decisions in R v Prater (1959) 44 Cr. App. R. 83 and Ramroop v R (1963) 6 W.I.R. 425 were authority for saying that the warning under reference should have been given. In Prater's case (supra) the Court of Crim......
-
Brathwaite v R (No. 2)
...an accomplice or not: we think that in the circumstances he could reasonably be regarded as having some purpose of his own to serve. In Ramroop v. R. (1963) 6 W.I.R. 425 a judgment of the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago, Hyatali, J.A. said (at p. 428): “The fourth ground raises a qu......
Request a trial to view additional results