PR v Income Tax Commissioner
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Judgment Date | 1959 |
| Date | 1959 |
| Year | 1959 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Trinidad and Tobago) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
G A Roe & Sons Ltd v Commissioner of Stamps Attorney General of Belize
...v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997; Parinv (Hatfield) Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1998] STC 305; PR v Income Tax Commissioner (1959) 2 WIR 149; Shell Canada Ltd v Canada 99 DTC 5669; Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia (1908) 5 CLR 418; Stanyforth v Com......
-
George Daniel Defendant/Appellant v Comptroller of Inland Revenue Complainant/Respondent [ECSC]
...but of the furnishing of a return, but I can see no reason to apply different principles. 21 InP.R. v Income Tax Commissioners [1959] 2 WIR 14010 Blagden, Ag. C.J. referred to the "overall plan on which a Taxing Statute is designed" as summarised by Lord Dunedin in Whitney v I.R. Commission......
-
Louis Andre Monteil v The Board of Inland Revenue
...ITA. A section that imposes liability on the tax payer (a charging section) must be construed strictly. Blagden Ag CJ observed in PR v Income Tax Commissioner (1959) 2 WIR 149 that a charging section must be construed strictly and especially in cases of doubt it is construed against the St......
- Attorney-General v Hosein