Peters (Winston) v Attorney-General and Another; Chaitan (William) v Attorney-General and Another
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Dabdoub (Abraham) v Vaz (Daryl) et Al and Vaz v Dabdoub
...interpreting and relying on the Australian decision of Sykes v Cleary (No. 2) [1992] 176 CLR 77 and the Trinidadian case of Chaitan v The Attorney General [2001] 63 WIR 244. 20 As if these grounds of appeal were not enough for the determination of the matter, Mr. Dabdoub filed a counter-no......
-
Dabdoub (Abraham) v Daryl Vaz, Carlton Harris and Attorney General of Jamaica
...that Constitution is similar to section 40(2)(a) of the Jamaican Constitution. He finds support in the Judgment of Nelson J.A. in Chaitan v Attorney General (2001) 63 WIR 244 at 377 where he states: "In my view the phrase under a declaration of allegiance to such a country in section 48 (1......
-
Brenton Henry v Her Honour Mrs. D. Gallimore-Rose
...matter. She referred the court to Peters (Winston) v Attorney General and Another; Chaitan (William) v Attorney General and Another (2001) 62 WIR 244. She stated that in Peters, the Court of Appeal in Trinidad had to consider the situation where there was a failure by the Rules Committee in......
-
Bobette Smalling v Dawn Satterswaite and Others
...of Appeal in Trinidad and Tobago. [Peters Winston] v Attorney — General and another; Chaitan [William] v Attorney — General and Another [2001] 62 WIR 244; Port Contractors Ltd v Shipping Association of Trinidad; Shell Trinidad Ltd v Seamen and Waterfront Workers Trade Union [1972] 21 WIR 50......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Our Inherent Constitution
...classicus on interpretation of Caribbean constitutions’ bills of rights, Lord Wilberforce said that the generality of 120. Peters v AG (2001) 62 WIR 244 (CA T&T). 121. Bowen (n 24) 57. 122. Recent examples include Bowe v R [2006] UKPC 10, (2006) 68 WIR 10 (Bah); Grant v R [2006] UKPC 2, (20......