Matthews v State
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
- R v Maharaj; and other appeals
-
Tiwari v State of Trinidad and Tobago
... ... The issue has been determined by the Court of Appeal in its judgment in Matthews v The State (unreported), on 1 December 2000; Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago (Cr A No 99 of 1999). The court decided that a failure by a magistrate to comply with section 18 did not necessarily render a subsequent conviction after a trial a nullity. In the course of delivering the judgment ... ...
-
R v Perez
...conviction after trial must be quashed. The issue has been determined by the Court of Appeal in its judgment in Matthews v. State ([2001] 3 LRC 400). The court decided that a failure by a magistrate to comply with s.18 did not necessarily render a subsequent conviction after a trial a nulli......
-
Arden Blackman v The Attorney-General
...on to consider the actual consequence of any breach of due process on the fairness of the proceedings. This position is illustrated by Matthews v The State 20, which discusses Neill v North Antrim Magistrate's Court, 21 both examined further below. Matthews v The State 22 (i) The Trinidad a......
Request a trial to view additional results