Marshall v Semper and Others

JurisdictionTrinidad & Tobago
Date1966
Year1966
CourtHigh Court (Trinidad and Tobago)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Douglas v Bowen
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 31 July 1974
    ...Devlin's categorization has been accepted and applied without any detailed or critical analysis by that country's Court of Appeal in Marshall v. Semper, (1966) 10 W.I.R. 129 (a case of assault, wrongful arrest and false imprisonment) and Valentine v. Rampersand (1970) 17 W.I.R. 12 (a case ......
  • St. Lucia Service Company Ltd v Crownlands Ltd
    • St Lucia
    • High Court (Saint Lucia)
    • 8 November 1995
    ...be authority on the grant or refusal of aggravated/exemplary damages. I refer to 98 Drake v. Evangelou [1978] 1 W.L.R. 455 ; 99 Marshall v. Semper [1966] 10 W.I.R. 129 ; 100 Valentine v. Rampersad [1970] 17 W.I.R. 12 ; 101 Louden v. Ryder [1953] 2 Q.B. 841 ; and 102 Fielding v. Var......
  • United Dominions Corporation (east Caribbean) Ltd v Stewart
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 14 December 1967
    ...v. Reo Motors Ltd. (1934) 151 L.T. 274 per Scrutton, L.J. at p. 277; Rookes v. Barnard [1964] A.C. 1129 per Lord Devlin at p. 1221; and Marshall v. Semper (1966) 10 W.I.R. 129, per Wooding, C.J., at pp. 132 and 133. I would therefore affirm the learned trial judge and dismiss this appeal wi......
  • Iles v Attorney General et Al
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • High Court (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 24 June 1993
    ...or authority on whose behalf that other person was acting:” 35 and concluded by referring to the following authorities:– (1) Marshall v. Semper and Others (1966) 10 W.I.R. 129 (i) at p. 131 letter (1) (dealing with wrongful arrest and false imprison which I hold to be in applicable and so i......