London (Junior) v The State
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Shivnarine and another v The State
-
Andrew Milton Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...by virtue of accepting the Crown's case. In the circumstances there was no need for a Lucas direction. Mr. Thompson also relies on London (Junior) v The State 26 where the Court of Appeal confirmed that it is not in every case that the express warning must be given. It is only where the exi......
-
Blakeney and Grant v The Queen
...of the interrelationship of identification and alibi. In short, this was not an identification that warranted such a direction. In London (Junior) v. The State (1999) 57 W.I.R. 424, 430, Warner, J.A. pointed out that is only where circumstances exist which create a risk that the jury may us......
-
Blakeney and Grant v R
...were referred to in the judgment: Joseph v RUNK [2010] EWCA Crim 2580 GeorgeUNK [2007] EWCA Crim 2722 London (Junior) v The StateUNK (1999) 57 WIR 424 Cox v RBDLR [2012] Bda LR 72 Myers v RBDLR [2012] Bda LR 74 R v OUNK [2010] EWCA Crim 2985 R v Hodges and WalkerUNK [2003] Cr App R 15 R v P......