Lett v R
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Year | 1963 |
| Date | 1963 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
- The State v Singh (Clement)
-
The State v Singh
...assuming in law no burden whatever to convince the jury about it, its justification or appropriateness: Lashley v. R [1959] L.R.B.G. 290; Lett v. R (1963) 6 W.I.R. 92; The State v. Bissessar, Crim. App. C.A.(Guyana), No.19/1975, unreported; Mohamed Omar v. The State (1987) 40 W.I.R. 7 Here......
-
The State v Lewis
...doubt as to whether the facts show sufficient provocation, that issue must be determined in favour of the accused. [See Lott v. R., (1963) 6 W.I.R. 92; R. v. Prince, (1943) 28 C.A.R. and R. v. Richards, (1967) 11 W.I.R. 102.] Plainly, those were grave misdirections and the appellant might......
-
Denis Alphonse Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...that the original intent must still have been operative in the mind of the accused notwithstanding the intervening provocative act. 18 In Lett v R (1963) 6 WIR 92 Wooding C.J. in the Court of Appeal Trinidad and Tobago said at p.96: "In other words, the jury did not have to find that there ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Some perspectives on provocation and domestic killing
...a quite separate occasion, and that this approach is already written 48 [1992] 1 All E.R. 306, 314 (italics mine). 49 See, e.g., Lett (1963) 6 W.I.R. 92; Bunting (1965) 8 W.I.R. 276; Antoine & Bass (1968) 13 W.I.R. 289; Julien (1970) 16 W.I.R. 395; Baptiste (1983) 34 W.I.R 253. 50 At p. 96.......