Lasalle Shah Lai Leung Noray Guy v R
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1972 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Hilroy Humphreys Claimant v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda Defendant. [ECSC]
...is now defined in section 41 (2) to mean any statement admitted in evidence in committal proceedings "under this Act." 1See:LASALLE SHAH LAI LEUNG NORAY GUY v R [1972] 20 WIR 361,416 per Fraser JA. 1 Ibid. 2 This contrasts with section 49(6) of the Constitution of Barbados which provides as......
-
Shell Company (W.I) Ltd v Caribbean Cement Company Ltd
... ... this to say in Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bois (Suisse) SA v de Noray [1984] 1 Lloyd's Rep 21 at 23 ... "It is of course trite ... ...
-
Humphreys v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda
...right to cross-examine a prosecution witness as fully as the law permits is basic to the administration of justice.” (See: Lasalle Shah Lai Leung Noray Guy v. R (1972) 20 W.I.R. 361, 416 per Fraser, J.A.) Therefore when the Court wrongfully restricted the cross-examination of the brigader f......
1 books & journal articles
-
Our Inherent Constitution
...29. Lewis v AG (2000) 57 WIR 275 (PC Ja). 30. Ibid 309. 31. Gairy v AG [2001] UKPC 30, (1999) 59 WIR 174 [11] (Gren); Lasalle v AG (1972) 20 WIR 361 (CA T&T); Mohammed v State (1998) 53 WIR 444, 447 (PC T&T). 32. Thomas v Baptiste [1999] 3 WLR 249, (1998) 54 WIR 387 (PC T&T) ( Baptiste ). O......