Krishendath Sinanan, Basdeo Sinanan, Pradaye Sinanan and Ramesh Sinanan v The State (No 1); Brann (Bunny) v The State; Ramsingh Jairam v The State; Kennedy (Rawle) v The State; Raffick Mohammed v The State
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Akili Charles (No 2)
...that the Bail provision was not existing law and that the earlier majority Court of Appeal decision in Krishendath Sinaman v The State [1992] 44 WIR 359 was wrong in holding that the High Court did not have jurisdiction to grant bail to a person who had been committed for trial for murder.......
-
Urban St. Brice Claimant v Attorney General of Saint Lucia Defendant
...Lordships have fully in their mind the powerful statement of Bernard C.J. in the Court of Appeal in Krishendath Sinanan v. The State (1992) 44 W.I.R. 359 at pp 364–5 as to the difficulties faced by the courts of Trinidad and Tobago at that time … Their Lordships accept his view 'that claims......
- Murray (Glenroy) v The State
- Wallen and Another v Baptiste and Others (No 2)
Request a trial to view additional results