Hochoy v Nuge and Others
Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
Date | 1964 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
[1] The Prime Minister [2] Juno Samuel Appellants/Respondents v Sir Gerald Watt, Kcn, Qc Respondent/Appellant [ECSC]
...joined as a party when the Attorney-General was named in her place in accordance with the recommended constitutional procedure. Hochoy v NUGE and Others (1964) 7 WIR 174 followed. 2. The RPA 2001 makes provisions for the different political interests to be represented in the formation of......
-
[1] Hon. Shawn K. Richards [2] Hon. Timothy Harris [3] Hon. Eugene A. Hamilton [4] Hon. Mark Brantley Applicants v [1] The Constituency Boundaries Commission [2] His Excellency the Governor General [3] The Prime Minister of St. Christopher and Nevis [4] Attorney General of St Christopher and Nevis Respondents [ECSC]
...page 71) Considered: The Prime Minister and Juno Samuel v Sir Gerald WattQ.C. Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2012 andHochoy v Nuge and Others (1964) 7 WIR 174; Hon. Shawn K. Richards v The Constituencies Boundaries Commission SKBHCV 2009/0159 St Kitts and Nevis unreported;. Distinguishing: Re Blake ......
-
Faith Webster v The Public Service Commission
...represent the interests of the Governor-General, in respect of that claim. On that point, see the comments of the late Wooding C.J. in Hochoy v N.U.G.E. — (1964) 7 WIR 174, at page 181E – G. 111 In respect of this claim, it is this Court's view therefore, that it is the Attorney-General wh......
-
Dottin (The Commissioner of Police) v Belgrave (Governor General) and the Police Service Commission
...refer to that person by his or her name but by his or her office. A similar point of view was expressed by Wooding CJ in Hochoy v. N.U.G.E And Others (1964) 7 W.I.R. 174. DISPOSAL 89 For all of the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents, to be assessed if n......
Request a trial to view additional results