Deolal Sukhram, Girjadath Sewpersaud and Jainarine Persaud v The State

JurisdictionTrinidad & Tobago
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 19 décembre 2008
    ...possession of cocaine on 28 th October 2006, because that evidence was relevant and admissible circumstantial evidence. Deolal Sukhram et al v The State (1993) 44 WIR 400 applied. (7) Mr. Maduro suffered no prejudice in his trial on account of the judge's failure to give a specific direc......
  • Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 19 décembre 2008
    ...possession of cocaine on 28 th October 2006, because that evidence was relevant and admissible circumstantial evidence. Deolal Sukhram et al v The State (1993) 44.WIR 400 applied. (7) Mr. Maduro suffered no prejudice in his trial on account of the judge's failure to give a specific direc......
  • Williams (Hubert) v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal
    • 1 janvier 1995
  • Penny (Elvis) v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal
    • 1 janvier 1994
  • Request a trial to view additional results