Deolal Sukhram, Girjadath Sewpersaud and Jainarine Persaud v The State
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Year | 1993 |
| Date | 1993 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...possession of cocaine on 28 th October 2006, because that evidence was relevant and admissible circumstantial evidence. Deolal Sukhram et al v The State (1993) 44 WIR 400 applied. (7) Mr. Maduro suffered no prejudice in his trial on account of the judge's failure to give a specific direc......
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...possession of cocaine on 28 th October 2006, because that evidence was relevant and admissible circumstantial evidence. Deolal Sukhram et al v The State (1993) 44.WIR 400 applied. (7) Mr. Maduro suffered no prejudice in his trial on account of the judge's failure to give a specific direc......
- Williams (Hubert) v The State
-
Williams v R
...this connection R v. Taylor (1985) 80 Cr. App. R. 327 at 331; R v. Oatridge (1992) 94 Cr. App. R. 367; Sukram and Others v. The State (1993) 44 W.I.R. 400 at p.424; Sinauan v. The State (No. 2) 44 W.I.R. 383 at 392 HI; Earle William v. The State Criminal Appeal No.90/88. Let us state at onc......
Request a trial to view additional results