Deolal Sukhram, Girjadath Sewpersaud and Jainarine Persaud v The State
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Date | 1993 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...possession of cocaine on 28 th October 2006, because that evidence was relevant and admissible circumstantial evidence. Deolal Sukhram et al v The State (1993) 44 WIR 400 applied. (7) Mr. Maduro suffered no prejudice in his trial on account of the judge's failure to give a specific direc......
-
Malcolm Maduro Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...possession of cocaine on 28 th October 2006, because that evidence was relevant and admissible circumstantial evidence. Deolal Sukhram et al v The State (1993) 44.WIR 400 applied. (7) Mr. Maduro suffered no prejudice in his trial on account of the judge's failure to give a specific direc......
- Williams (Hubert) v The State
-
Williams v R
...this connection R v. Taylor (1985) 80 Cr. App. R. 327 at 331; R v. Oatridge (1992) 94 Cr. App. R. 367; Sukram and Others v. The State (1993) 44 W.I.R. 400 at p.424; Sinauan v. The State (No. 2) 44 W.I.R. 383 at 392 HI; Earle William v. The State Criminal Appeal No.90/88. Let us state at onc......
Get Started for Free
