Cadogan v R
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Year | 1963 |
| Date | 1963 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
- R v Maharaj; and other appeals
-
Mapp and Bissoon v The State
...of law that evidence found to be available at the time of the inquiry and not led by the prosecution ought not to be led at the trial: Cadogan v. R (1963) 6 WIR 292; R v Gomes (1962) 5 WIR 7. This principle was extended even as far back as 1970 when in R v. Clarke (1970) 16 WIR 59 the Jamai......
-
Carter et Al v The State
...available should be deliberately withheld and produced at the trial which would only result in embarrassment to the accused person.” 21 In Cadogan v. R (1963) 6 W.I.R. 292, this court held that committal proceedings in which the appellant was committed to stand trial was invalid, since evid......
-
Tiwarie v The State
...499). 28 The definition of ‘fresh evidence’ as enunciated by Hill, J. in Timmins v. Timmins [1919] P 75 at 80 and adopted by this court in Cadogan v. R (1963) 6 W.I.R. 292 is: ‘Evidence of something which has happened since the former hearing or has come to the knowledge of the party applyi......
Request a trial to view additional results