Bhola Nandlal v The State

JurisdictionTrinidad & Tobago
Date1995
Year1995
CourtCourt of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
16 cases
  • The Queen v Simeon Samuel Cornwall
    • Grenada
    • Supreme Court (Grenada)
    • 25 January 2009
    ...the court so that the court could have the full picture; that to do otherwise amounts to abuse of process. Counsel cites the cases of Bhola v The State (1995) 49 WIR 412; Verrier v Director of Public Prosecutions. 7 It is well settled that at least two persons must agree in order for there ......
  • Heron (Michael) v DPP and Attorney General for Jamaica
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 4 December 2000
    ...three concessions, found comfort in relying on DPP v. Humphrys (1977) A.C. 1, Cottle and another v. The Queen (1977) A.C. 323, Bhola Nandlal v The State (1995) 49 WIR 412, Sieuraj Sookermany v Director of Public Prosecutions and another (1996) 48 WIR 346, and Director of Public Prosecut......
  • Jerome Dixon v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 29 July 2022
    ...where the prosecution deliberately fails to join offences arising out of one incident and seeks to hold separate trials (see Bhola Nandlal v The State (1995) 49 WIR 44 So important are these principles that they have been recognised and protected by section 16 of the Charter of Fundamental......
  • [1] Henry Liu [2] Feng Huang Appellants v [1] Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica [2] DPP [3] Comptroller of Customs Respondents [ECSC]
    • Caribbean Community
    • Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court
    • 22 September 2008
    ...1351, 1354f to 1355c)." Dicta from Nazereus Andrew v Attorney General SLUHCV 2005/0090 delivered on 17 th June 2005 applied. Bhola Nandlal v The State [1995] 45 WIR 412 and Verrier v Director of Public Prosecutions (1967) 2 AC 195 applied. (2) The cross-appeal is allowed to the extent tha......
  • Get Started for Free