Benjamin v R
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1964 |
| Year | 1964 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
68 cases
-
Ashley Hield v R
...56 and continued] The principles of sentencing expounded above are well known and have been followed in numerous authorities including Benjamin v R (1964) 7 WIR 459, R v Sargeant (1974) 60 Cr App Rep 74 and Spenser (Ryan) and Fraser (Rodewell) v The State (1996) 54 WIR 278 . These unyiel......
-
Francis and Another v State
...which he was sentenced to four years hard labour. Mr. Singh then analyses the five principles of sentencing found in the authority of Mano Benjamin v. R (1964) 7 W.I.R. 459. 127 He submits that Francis is no longer in need of rehabilitation, given his adherence to religious practices and go......
-
R v David O'Connor
...Aloysius Ebner (CR 45 of 2019) [2019] TCASC 3; Aubeeluck v The State of Mauritius [2010] UKPC 13; R. v Avis [1998] 2 Cr. App. R. (S.) 17; Benjamin v R (1964) 7 WIR 459; R v Bowler [2007] EWCA Crim 2068; R v Anthony Clarke Junior; Lavardo Outten and R v Earnest Dolce (AG R 1 of 2017) [201......
-
The King v Zita Shol
...[16]. 19 Pompey v the DPP [2020] CCJ 7 (AJ), per Saunders PCCJ at [32]. 20 State v Sydney (2008) 74 WIR 290, per Cummings JA at 295. 21 Benjamin v R (1964) 7 WIR 459, per Wooding CJ, quoted with approval in Lashley v Singh [2014] CCJ 11 (AJ) at [31] and Alleyne v R (2019) 95 WIR 126. 22 R......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Sentencing
...some measure of proportion between one sentence and another can it do justice as between one offender and another. 6 In Benjamin v R (1964) 7 WIR 459, Wooding, C.J., in delivering the judgment of the Court said, inter alia, ‘…there are really five principles of sentencing: • The retributive......