Baptiste v Supersad and Montrose
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1967 |
| Court | High Court (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 cases
-
University Hospital Board of Management v Hyacinth Matthews
...of the right to pursue his case. The function of the Court is to do justice.’ 32 The learned judge of appeal then quoted Wooding CJ in Baptiste v Supersad and Montrose (1967) 12 WIR 140 at 144, where he stated that: ‘The law is not a game, nor is the court an arena. It is… the function and ......
-
(1) Jasdip Ltd v (1) Sea Breeze Hills Development Company Ltd
...189. Therefore, I have not been persuaded that there is no cause of action in the case at bar. 95 Wooding CJ in Baptiste v. Supersad 1967 12 WIR 140 p. 144, which was cited in the Montserrat case of Kevin Weste et al v. Shamrock Industries Ltd. by Redhead J. stated: “The law is not a game ......
-
Sainchand v Deonarine
...of any answer which would otherwise have been open to him, any proper amendment ought to be allowed. As Wooding, C.J. said in Baptiste v. Supersad and Montrose (1967) 12 W.I.R. 140, at p. 144, the law was not a game, nor was the Court an arena, and that an action should be decided consisten......
-
Paul Rey v Hugo Rey
...on the basis that it discloses no reasonable ground for bringing the claim must and does fail. 67 Wooding CJ in Baptiste v. Supersad 1967 12 WIR 140 p. 144, which was cited in the Montserrat case of Kevin Weste et al v. Shamrock Industries Ltd. by Redhead J. stated: “The law is not a game ......
Request a trial to view additional results