Attorney General v Lopinot Limestone Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Judgment Date | 1983 |
| Date | 1983 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Albert Deterville Applicant v 1. Wilbert King 2. Egbert Andrew 3. Jacques Compton 4. Attorney General Respondents [ECSC]
...and Jowell; pages 424/425; 2.Mclnnes v Onslow Fane 1978 3 A.E.R. 211; 3.Attorney-General Trinidad and Tobago v Lopinot Limestone Ltd (1983) 34 W.I.R.299; 4. Attorney-General Trinidad and Tobago v K. C. Confectionery Ltd (1958) 34 W.I.R. 387 . 70 Learned Counsel for the Applicant correctly s......
-
R v Attorney General ex parte Jamaican Bar Association
...of Lords decision in Council of Civil Service Onions and Others v. Minister for Civil Service (1984) 3 All E.R. 935 and Attorney General v. Lopinot Limestone Ltd. (1983) 34 W.I.R. 299. 191 The arguments advanced by Mr. Leys for the Respondent may be summarised as follows: 1. That to succee......
-
Broadgate Place Property Company Ltd v Minister of Planning Economic and Social Restructuring and Gender Affairs
...by its assurance whether expressly given by way of promise or implied by way of an established practice. 70 In the case of Attorney General v. Lopinot Limestone Ltd. (1983) 34 W.I.R. 299 the Trinidad and Tobago Court of Appeal held that the Minister's decision was null and void because the ......
-
Mitchell v The Commissioner of Police et Al
...of Police — Exhibits C.M.3–5 refer — cannot satisfy the requirements of the Act. 25 In Attorney General v. Lipinot Limestone Ltd. (1983) 34 W.I.R. 299 Hassanali, J.A. stated at p.317:– “The question is whether there was a breach of the rules of natural justice. For the Attorney- General it ......