Aqui v Pooran Maharaj

JurisdictionTrinidad & Tobago
CourtCourt of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
Year1983
Date1983

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • Bertolino v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 26 October 1990
    ...and R. R. Small and D. Murray for the appellant; I. Archie, Crown Counsel for the Crown. Cases cited: (1) Aqui v. Pooran MaharajUNK(1983), 34 W.I.R. 282, followed. (2) Bookers Stores Ltd. v. Mustapha AllyUNK(1972), 19 W.I.R. 230, observations of Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest applied. (3) Heln......
  • 1) Casanki Quow of Barrouallie 2) Osrick James of Fancy 3) Hadley Ballantyne of Georgetown v Commissioner of Police
    • St Vincent
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Vincent)
    • 21 February 2011
    ...Whether an adjudicator's reasons for decision are adequate depends on the circumstances of each case. Dicta in Aqui v Pooran Maharaj (1981) 34 W.I.R. 282, applied. 2. The general rule is that in giving reasons for a decision, an adjudicator should identify and explain each factor which was ......
  • Alexander v Williams
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • Lovell v Rayside Construction Ltd
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • 4 March 2010
    ...that it is an error of law for a judge to fail to give any or any adequate reasons for his decision. He referred to the case of Aqui v. Pooran Maharaj [1983] 34 WIR 282 in which the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago stated that where the judge or magistrate at first instance has failed......
  • Get Started for Free