Alexander v Williams
| Jurisdiction | Trinidad & Tobago |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
1) Shane Graham 2) Ray JNO Baptiste v The Police
...and sentences be quashed and new trials ordered. Forbes v Chandrabhan Maharaj (1998) 52 WIR 487 followed; Alexander v Williams (1984) 34 WIR 340 applied. 3. In respect of the appellant Daniel, there was a failure of due process by the Magistrate's failure to (1) inquire as to whether or no......
-
Jerome Dixon v R
...court ought to quash the conviction in the interests of justice. The cases included Forbes v Chandrabhan Maharaj (1998) 52 WIR 487, Alexander v Williams (1984) 34 WIR 340 and Griffith v Niewenkirk GY 2004 CA 212 He also brought some authorities to the court's attention which came to a dif......
-
Garibdass et Al v Sookhan et Al
...involves that it should be invested with a power to maintain its authority and to prevent its process being obstructed and abused (see Alexander v Williams (1984) 34 W.I.R. 340 CA at 345c-347b). 4 It has been said that the overriding features of the inherent jurisdiction of the court are, t......
- Fuller (Winston) v The State
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Appeals
...the Magistrate was not obliged by statute to give reasons for his decision, the Court of Appeal in the case of Alexander v Williams (1984) 34 WIR 340 stated per Bernard, J.A. It is quite true that a Magistrate is a creature of statute and that there is not statutory enjoinder in the Act whi......